Alliance Auto Auction of Dallas, Inc. v. Lone Star Cleburne Autoplex, Inc.
This text of Alliance Auto Auction of Dallas, Inc. v. Lone Star Cleburne Autoplex, Inc. (Alliance Auto Auction of Dallas, Inc. v. Lone Star Cleburne Autoplex, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-19-00226-CV
ALLIANCE AUTO AUCTION OF DALLAS, INC., Appellant v.
LONE STAR CLEBURNE AUTOPLEX, INC., Appellee
From the 18th District Court Johnson County, Texas Trial Court No. DC-C201900316
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Lone Star Cleburne Autoplex, Inc. and Alliance Auto Auction of Dallas, Inc. filed
a “Joint Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice.” The parties have fully and finally resolved
all claims in this case asserted by Lone Star against Alliance and jointly request that the
Court dismiss all claims by Lone Star against Alliance with prejudice and with each of
the parties bearing its own attorney’s fees, expenses, and costs.
While we have no authority to simply dismiss the suit in the trial court, see TEX. R.
APP. P. 43.2, we have the authority to vacate the trial court's judgment and dismiss the case by agreement of the parties. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1 (a) (2) (A); 43.2 (e); Young
Materials Corp. v. Smith, 4 S.W.3d 84 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999, no pet.).
Accordingly, the parties’ “Joint Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice,” filed on
April 2, 2024, is granted to the extent authorized. The trial court's “Order Denying
Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Case Filed by Defendant Alliance Auto Auction
of Dallas, Inc.,” filed on July 2, 2019 is vacated, and the case is dismissed with prejudice.
See id. Further, pursuant to the parties’ agreement, all costs, expenses, and attorney’s fees
are ordered taxed against the party incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (d).
Because the Court was unable to grant the entirety of the parties' motion, the Court
has endeavored to implement the substance of the parties' agreed motion to achieve the
same result. If the parties determine that the judgment of the Court does not accomplish
the parties' intended result, a timely motion for rehearing must be filed which addresses
the manner in which the Court can implement the agreement of the parties within the
limitations of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1; 43.2; 49.1.
TOM GRAY Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Smith Motion granted Vacated and case dismissed with prejudice Opinion delivered and filed April 11, 2024 [CV06]
Alliance Auto Auction of Dallas, Inc. v. Lone Star Cleburne Autoplex, Inc. Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Alliance Auto Auction of Dallas, Inc. v. Lone Star Cleburne Autoplex, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alliance-auto-auction-of-dallas-inc-v-lone-star-cleburne-autoplex-inc-texapp-2024.