Allgeyer v. CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL

Missouri Court of Appeals

Allgeyer v. CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL

157 S.W.3d 366, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 333, 2005 WL 465892

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 1, 2005

DocketED 84645

StatusPublished

This text of 157 S.W.3d 366 (Allgeyer v. CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allgeyer v. CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, 157 S.W.3d 366, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 333, 2005 WL 465892 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation case, the claimant, Patricia Allgeyer, appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s final award denying compensation finding that the claimant’s claim was barred by the statute of limitations.

We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. We find the Commission’s decision is supported by sufficient competent and substantial evidence on the whole record and no error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. *367 The Commission’s award is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation case, the claimant, Patricia Allgeyer, appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s final award denying compensation finding that the claimant’s claim was barred by the statute of limitations.

We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. We find the Commission’s decision is supported by sufficient competent and substantial evidence on the whole record and no error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. *367 The Commission’s award is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 S.W.3d 366, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 333, 2005 WL 465892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allgeyer-v-cardinal-glennon-childrens-hospital-moctapp-2005.