Allgeier v. Campisi

159 S.E.2d 458, 117 Ga. App. 105
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 17, 1968
Docket43304, 43317
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 159 S.E.2d 458 (Allgeier v. Campisi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allgeier v. Campisi, 159 S.E.2d 458, 117 Ga. App. 105 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Pannell, Judge.

1. Where, as in the present case, an indi-

vidual owner of an automobile delivers it to an automobile dealer for the purpose of having said dealer secure offers for the purchase thereof, and to sell the same upon approval of an offer by the individual owner, the automobile dealer to receive a commission of a set sum regardless of the sale price, such transaction is not a “sale or return” transaction between a buyer and a seller within the meaning of the Georgia Uniform Commercial Code § 109A-2 — 326, so as to make said automobile subject to levy and sale upon executions obtained against the automobile dealer by creditors of the dealer. For this reason the cases of Guardian Discount Co. v. Settles, 114 Ga. App. 418 (151 SE2d 530); McDonald v. Peoples Automobile Loan &c. Corp., 115 Ga. App. 483 (154 SE2d 886) have no application. Accordingly the jury upon the trial of the claims filed by the individual owner in the present cases was authorized under the evidence to find in favor of the claimant and the trial court did not err in refusing to direct verdicts in favor of either of the plaintiffs in execution nor did he err in entering judgments upon the verdict in favor of the claimant.

2. The other enumerations of error not dealt with above are without merit.

Judgments affirmed.

Jordan, P. J., and Deen, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Murphy v. Southtrust Bank of Alabama, N.A.
611 So. 2d 269 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1992)
Robbins v. Comerica Bank-Detroit (In Re Zwagerman)
115 B.R. 540 (W.D. Michigan, 1990)
Escrow Connection v. Haas
189 Cal. App. 3d 1640 (California Court of Appeal, 1987)
In Re STN Enterprises, Inc.
45 B.R. 935 (D. Vermont, 1984)
Logan Paving Co. v. Massey-Ferguson Credit Corp.
323 S.E.2d 259 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1984)
Newhall v. Haines
10 B.R. 1019 (D. Montana, 1981)
Bischoff v. Thomasson
400 So. 2d 359 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1981)
Cosgriff v. Liberty National Bank & Trust Co.
58 Misc. 2d 884 (New York Supreme Court, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 S.E.2d 458, 117 Ga. App. 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allgeier-v-campisi-gactapp-1968.