Allflex Usa, Inc. v. Avid Identification Systems, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Allflex Usa, Inc. v. Avid Identification Systems, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedDecember 22, 2011

Docket2011-1621

StatusUnpublished

This text of Allflex Usa, Inc. v. Avid Identification Systems, Inc. (Allflex Usa, Inc. v. Avid Identification Systems, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allflex Usa, Inc. v. Avid Identification Systems, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit ALLFLEX USA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, V. AVID IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS, INC., Defendan,t-Appellant. 2011-1621 Appea1 from the United States District C0urt for the Central District of Calif0rnia in case n0. 06-CV-1109, Seni0r Judge Mariana R. Pfae1zer. ALLFLEX USA, INC., Plain,tiff-Appellee, V. AVID IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS, INC., Defendcmt, AND FISH & RICHARDSON P.C., Sanction,ecl Party-Appellant.

ALLFLEX USA V. AVID IDENTIFICATION 2 2012-1007 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central DiStrict of California in case no. 06-CV-1109, Seni0r Judge Mariana R. Pfae1zer. ON MOTION ORDER The court treats the letter from Fish & Richardson P.C. indicating that it will not be participating as a mo- tion to voluntarily dismiss its appeal. " Upon consideration thereof, IT ls ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted Appeal 2012-1007 is dis- missed. The revised official captions are reflected above (2) Each side shall bear its own costs in 2012-1007. FoR THE CoUR'r 1359 2 2 2011 131 Jan H@rba1y Date J an Horbaly Clerk ccc K.T. Cherian, Esq. Christian Chadd Taylor, Esq. Christopher S. Marchese, Esq. ¢_3_ cows mn S8 THE FEDERAL C1RCUlT Issued As A Mandate (As To 2012-1007 Only): mic 2 2011 DEC 2 2 2011 .lA|'lcHORBALY LERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit ALLFLEX USA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, V. AVID IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS, INC., Defendan,t-Appellant. 2011-1621 Appea1 from the United States District C0urt for the Central District of Calif0rnia in case n0. 06-CV-1109, Seni0r Judge Mariana R. Pfae1zer. ALLFLEX USA, INC., Plain,tiff-Appellee, V. AVID IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS, INC., Defendcmt, AND FISH & RICHARDSON P.C., Sanction,ecl Party-Appellant.

ALLFLEX USA V. AVID IDENTIFICATION 2 2012-1007 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central DiStrict of California in case no. 06-CV-1109, Seni0r Judge Mariana R. Pfae1zer. ON MOTION ORDER The court treats the letter from Fish & Richardson P.C. indicating that it will not be participating as a mo- tion to voluntarily dismiss its appeal. " Upon consideration thereof, IT ls ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted Appeal 2012-1007 is dis- missed. The revised official captions are reflected above (2) Each side shall bear its own costs in 2012-1007. FoR THE CoUR'r 1359 2 2 2011 131 Jan H@rba1y Date J an Horbaly Clerk ccc K.T. Cherian, Esq. Christian Chadd Taylor, Esq. Christopher S. Marchese, Esq. ¢_3_ cows mn S8 THE FEDERAL C1RCUlT Issued As A Mandate (As To 2012-1007 Only): mic 2 2011 DEC 2 2 2011 .lA|'lcHORBALY LERK

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Allflex Usa, Inc. v. Avid Identification Systems, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allflex-usa-inc-v-avid-identification-systems-inc-cafc-2011.