Alleyne v. Alleyne

46 A.D.2d 785, 360 N.Y.S.2d 706, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3655
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 12, 1974
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 46 A.D.2d 785 (Alleyne v. Alleyne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alleyne v. Alleyne, 46 A.D.2d 785, 360 N.Y.S.2d 706, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3655 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

In an action for divorce based ton cruel and inhuman treatment and abandonment, the plaintiff husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme (¡Court, Kings County, dated January 26, 1973, as dismissed his complaint after a nonjury trial. Case remitted to the Special Term for formulation of findings of fact essential to its decision; determination of appeal held in abeyance in the interim. Upon the making of appropriate findings and the riling of the record thereof in this court, the appeal will be restored to the calendar. An intelligent judicial review of the decision of the Special Term cannot be had in the absence of findings essential to the decision (CPLR 4213, subd. [b]). The findings of fact set forth in the judgment appealed from are inadequate in that they shed no light on the reasons underlying the Special Term’s dismissal of the complaint. This court has had occasion in ¡the past to express its dismay regarding the failure of Trial Judges in nonjury cases to comply fully and meaningfully with (CPLR 4213 (subd. [b]). (See Matter of Borneo v. Borneo, 40 A D 2d 685; Drishell v. Alfana, 12 A D 2d 973.) We take this opportunity to emphasize once again the importance of compliance with the statutory requirement. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Christ, Brennan 4nd Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brenner v. de Bruin
171 A.D.2d 833 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Baratta v. Baratta
102 A.D.2d 838 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Patrizio v. Patrizio
94 A.D.2d 971 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Giordano v. Giordano
93 A.D.2d 310 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Bauer v. Bauer
88 A.D.2d 737 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Ken Wire & Metal Products, Inc. v. Vogel's Inc.
69 A.D.2d 898 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Porges v. Porges
61 A.D.2d 980 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Berlin v. Berlin
60 A.D.2d 861 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Schwartz v. Schwartz
52 A.D.2d 874 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 A.D.2d 785, 360 N.Y.S.2d 706, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alleyne-v-alleyne-nyappdiv-1974.