Alley v. State

225 S.W.2d 970, 154 Tex. Crim. 145
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 23, 1949
DocketNo. 24559.
StatusPublished

This text of 225 S.W.2d 970 (Alley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alley v. State, 225 S.W.2d 970, 154 Tex. Crim. 145 (Tex. 1949).

Opinions

Appellant pleaded guilty under an information charging an aggravated assault and was by the trial court fined $250.00 and sentenced to serve one year in the county jail, and he appeals.

The statement of facts is found to have been included in the transcript of the clerk which is contrary to the statute as amended in 1931, and found in Article 760, Vernon's Ann. C. C. P., Vol. 3, (Pocket Part, p. 43), Section 2 of which article reads as follows:

"2. To accompany Transcript. — The Statement of Facts in felony or misdemeanor cases shall not be copied in The Transcript of the Clerk, but when agreed to by the parties and approved by the Judge, shall be filed in duplicate with the Clerk, and the original sent up as a part of the record of the cause on appeal; and like procedure shall be followed if the Statement of Facts is prepared by the parties or by the Judge, on the failure of the parties to agree."

Therefore we cannot consider this presented statement of facts.

There are also five bills of exception found in the record, four of them being disallowed by the trial court and no exception found thereto. The remaining bill, being the only one allowed, relates to the action of the trial court is overruling the motion for a new trial, which was needless, it not being necessary that such bill be reversed. See 4 Tex. Jur. p. 399, sec. 266, as to the requirements of a bill of exception complaining of the overruling of a motion for a new trial.

On account of the absence of a statement of facts properly brought forward, we have no error presented herein. See Crutchfield v. State, 148 Tex.Crim. R., 187 S.W.2d 911.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. *Page 147

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dyer v. State
83 S.W. 192 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1904)
Crutchfield v. State
187 S.W.2d 911 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 S.W.2d 970, 154 Tex. Crim. 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alley-v-state-texcrimapp-1949.