Alley v. . Hampton

13 N.C. 11
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 5, 1828
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 13 N.C. 11 (Alley v. . Hampton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alley v. . Hampton, 13 N.C. 11 (N.C. 1828).

Opinion

*12 Hall, Judge.

Where the Jury have found a verdict against evidence, this Court has not power to set it aside. That can only be done by the Judge in the Court below. jt appearg that when the Jury first came in with a verdict, they had not finally made it up from the evidence which they had heard. The Court sent them back, and told them such a verdict could not be received; as it did not finally settle the question. There appears to be nothing objectionable in this. It is not proper to read the affidavit of the Juror. If it was, it would only prove that the Jury had been balancing upon the testimony of Jones, one of the witnesses.

Per Curiam. — Let the judgment be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goldston v. Chambers
157 S.E.2d 676 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1967)
Goodman v. . Goodman
161 S.E. 686 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)
Edwards v. . Phifer
27 S.E. 79 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 N.C. 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alley-v-hampton-nc-1828.