Alley v. Booth

Texas Supreme Court

Alley v. Booth

16 Tex. 94

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1856

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 16 Tex. 94 (Alley v. Booth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alley v. Booth, 16 Tex. 94 (Tex. 1856).

Pincite

Opinion

Wheeleb, J.

Whether the contract was made with the plaintiff, or with him and McKinnon jointly, and also the amount which the plaintiff was entitled to recover in case it was made with him singly, were questions of fact, which it was for the jury to decide. The evidence conflicting, it was a proper case for them to judge of the credibility of witnesses and the weight of evidence. It is one of that class of cases in which this Court has uniformly declined to reverse the judgment because a new trial was refused. The judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wheeleb, J.

Whether the contract was made with the plaintiff, or with him and McKinnon jointly, and also the amount which the plaintiff was entitled to recover in case it was made with him singly, were questions of fact, which it was for the jury to decide. The evidence conflicting, it was a proper case for them to judge of the credibility of witnesses and the weight of evidence. It is one of that class of cases in which this Court has uniformly declined to reverse the judgment because a new trial was refused. The judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 Tex. 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alley-v-booth-tex-1856.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack