Alleviation Med. Servs., P.C. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Alleviation Med. Servs., P.C. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 6, 2016

Docket2016 NYSlipOp 50922(U)

StatusPublished

This text of Alleviation Med. Servs., P.C. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (Alleviation Med. Servs., P.C. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alleviation Med. Servs., P.C. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Alleviation Medical Services, P.C., as Assignee of KADEEM ANDERSON, Appellant,

against

State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Genine D. Edwards, J.), entered June 6, 2013. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, with $30 costs, and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

While defendant submitted an affirmation from the doctor who was scheduled to perform the independent medical examinations (IMEs), the doctor did not establish that he possessed personal knowledge of the nonappearance of plaintiff's assignor for the IMEs. Therefore, defendant failed to establish its entitlement, as a matter of law, to judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff's assignor had failed to appear for IMEs (see Bright Med. Supply Co. v IDS Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 40 Misc 3d 130[A], 2013 NY Slip Op 51123[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2013]; Alrof, Inc. v Safeco Natl. Ins. Co., 39 Misc 3d 130[A], 2013 NY Slip Op 50458[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2013]). In addition, as each IME scheduling letter was mailed to plaintiff's assignor at a different address, there is also an issue fact as to whether plaintiff's assignor received notice of both scheduled IMEs.

Accordingly, the order is reversed and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.

Pesce, P.J., Aliotta and Solomon, JJ., concur.

Decision Date: June 06, 2016

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alleviation Medical Services, P.C., as Assignee of KADEEM ANDERSON, Appellant,

against

State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Genine D. Edwards, J.), entered June 6, 2013. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, with $30 costs, and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

While defendant submitted an affirmation from the doctor who was scheduled to perform the independent medical examinations (IMEs), the doctor did not establish that he possessed personal knowledge of the nonappearance of plaintiff's assignor for the IMEs. Therefore, defendant failed to establish its entitlement, as a matter of law, to judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff's assignor had failed to appear for IMEs (see Bright Med. Supply Co. v IDS Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 40 Misc 3d 130[A], 2013 NY Slip Op 51123[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2013]; Alrof, Inc. v Safeco Natl. Ins. Co., 39 Misc 3d 130[A], 2013 NY Slip Op 50458[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2013]). In addition, as each IME scheduling letter was mailed to plaintiff's assignor at a different address, there is also an issue fact as to whether plaintiff's assignor received notice of both scheduled IMEs.

Accordingly, the order is reversed and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.

Pesce, P.J., Aliotta and Solomon, JJ., concur.

Decision Date: June 06, 2016

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Alleviation Med. Servs., P.C. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alleviation-med-servs-pc-v-state-farm-mut-auto-ins-co-nyappterm-2016.