Allenspach v. Goetz Waterline Ass'n

Michigan Court of Appeals

Allenspach v. Goetz Waterline Ass'n

184 N.W.2d 462, 28 Mich. App. 432, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 1191

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 3, 1970

DocketDocket No. 7636

StatusPublished

This text of 184 N.W.2d 462 (Allenspach v. Goetz Waterline Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allenspach v. Goetz Waterline Ass'n, 184 N.W.2d 462, 28 Mich. App. 432, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 1191 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant, a nonprofit corporation, is a private water company which provides water service to plaintiffs. By this action, plaintiffs seek ownership rights in defendant, including the right to vote, and other relief. The only issue litigated below was whether plaintiffs are members, or entitled to become members, of defendant. In an exhaustive opinion, the trial judge held that plaintiffs were neither members nor entitled to become members of defendant, and they appeal from the judgment denying relief.

[433]*433After reviewing the record and considering the briefs and oral arguments, we are convinced that the trial judge was correct in his findings of fact and his conclusions of law. These findings and conclusions fully support the judgment below. Further comment would be superfluous.

Affirmed with costs to defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant, a nonprofit corporation, is a private water company which provides water service to plaintiffs. By this action, plaintiffs seek ownership rights in defendant, including the right to vote, and other relief. The only issue litigated below was whether plaintiffs are members, or entitled to become members, of defendant. In an exhaustive opinion, the trial judge held that plaintiffs were neither members nor entitled to become members of defendant, and they appeal from the judgment denying relief.

[433]*433After reviewing the record and considering the briefs and oral arguments, we are convinced that the trial judge was correct in his findings of fact and his conclusions of law. These findings and conclusions fully support the judgment below. Further comment would be superfluous.

Affirmed with costs to defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

184 N.W.2d 462, 28 Mich. App. 432, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 1191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allenspach-v-goetz-waterline-assn-michctapp-1970.