Allenberg v. Rapken Company, Ltd.

California Court of Appeal

Allenberg v. Rapken Company, Ltd.

286 P. 1059, 105 Cal. App. 142, 1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 639

California Court of Appeal·Decided April 9, 1930·No. Docket No. 7188.·Published

Opinion

[1] Motion to affirm judgment on the ground that appellant has failed to point out or set forth in his brief or any supplement thereto, in accordance with the provisions of section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure any part of the record sufficient to justify a reversal or present any issues before this court as to which said appeal has been taken. An examination of appellant's brief reveals the fact that he has set forth in his brief certain portions of the record. It will be presumed that they are the portions that he desires to call to the attention of the court. (Schurman v. Look, 190 Cal. 113 [210 P. 816].)

The motion is denied.

Knight, J., and Cashin, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[1] Motion to affirm judgment on the ground that appellant has failed to point out or set forth in his brief or any supplement thereto, in accordance with the provisions of section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure any part of the record sufficient to justify a reversal or present any issues before this court as to which said appeal has been taken. An examination of appellant's brief reveals the fact that he has set forth in his brief certain portions of the record. It will be presumed that they are the portions that he desires to call to the attention of the court. (Schurman v. Look, 190 Cal. 113 [210 P. 816].)

The motion is denied.

Knight, J., and Cashin, J., concurred.

Allenberg v. Rapken Company, Ltd., 286 P. 1059, 105 Cal. App. 142, 1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 639 (Cal. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

286 P. 1059 (Allenberg v. Rapken Company, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related