Allenberg v. Rapken & Co.

105 Cal. App. 142
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedApril 9, 1930
DocketCiv. No. 7188
StatusPublished

This text of 105 Cal. App. 142 (Allenberg v. Rapken & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allenberg v. Rapken & Co., 105 Cal. App. 142 (Cal. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

TYLER, P. J.

Motion to affirm judgment on the ground that appellant has failed to point out or set forth in his brief or any supplement thereto, in accordance with the provisions of section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure any part of the record sufficient to justify a reversal or present any issues before this court as to which said appeal has been taken. An examination of appellant’s brief reveals the fact that he has set forth in his brief certain portions of the record. It will be presumed that they are the portions that he desires to call to the attention of the court. (Schurman v. Look, 190 Cal. 113 [210 Pac. 816].) The motion is denied.

Knight, J., and Cashin, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schurman v. Look
210 P. 816 (California Supreme Court, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 Cal. App. 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allenberg-v-rapken-co-calctapp-1930.