Allenberg Cotton Co. v. Pittman

Supreme Court

Allenberg Cotton Co. v. Pittman

414 U.S. 1109, 94 S. Ct. 838

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 17, 1973·No. No. 73-628·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from Sup. Ct. Miss. Consideration of jurisdictional statement deferred to accord counsel for appellant opportunity to secure a certificate from the Supreme [1110]*1110Court of Mississippi as to whether the judgment herein was intended to rest on an adequate and independent state ground or on federal grounds. Charleston Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. Alderson, 324 U. S. 182, 186 n. 1 (1945).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from Sup. Ct. Miss. Consideration of jurisdictional statement deferred to accord counsel for appellant opportunity to secure a certificate from the Supreme [1110]*1110Court of Mississippi as to whether the judgment herein was intended to rest on an adequate and independent state ground or on federal grounds. Charleston Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. Alderson, 324 U. S. 182, 186 n. 1 (1945).

Allenberg Cotton Co. v. Pittman, 414 U.S. 1109, 94 S. Ct. 838 (1973).

Pincite

414 U.S. 1109 (Allenberg Cotton Co. v. Pittman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related