Allen Woodyard v. Charles Ryan

546 F. App'x 700
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 27, 2013·No. 13-15899·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Allen Woodyard appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his request for preliminary injunctive relief against defendant prison officials. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief, and we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 U.S. 7, 24, 129 S.Ct. 365, 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int'l 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir.1982) (explaining limited scope of review). 1

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. *

1

. Appellant’s motion to expedite is denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen Woodyard v. Charles Ryan, 546 F. App'x 700 (9th Cir. 2013).

546 F. App'x 700 (Allen Woodyard v. Charles Ryan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related