Allen v. Wilson

District Court, E.D. Louisiana·Decided July 31, 2025·No. 2:25-cv-00102·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA GARY ALLEN CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO.25-0102 DET. JACK WILSON, ET AL. SECTION M (2)

ORDER After considering the complaint, the record, the applicable law, and the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”),1 and upon finding that, as of this date, plaintiff has not filed objections to the R&R, the Court hereby approves the R&R and adopts it as its opinion. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Gary Allen’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against defendant NOPD Administration be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) and §1915A as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Gary Allen’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against defendants NOPD Administration, Detective Jack Wilson, Officer Bryan Rojas, and Amy Gisleson be DISMISSED as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). New Orleans, Louisiana, this 31st day of July, 2025.

_________________________________ BARRY W. ASHE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1 R. Doc. 10.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen v. Wilson, (E.D. La. 2025).

Allen v. Wilson (Allen v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heck v. Humphrey
512 U.S. 477 (Supreme Court, 1994)