Allen v. US Supreme Court Office of the Clerk

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedJune 15, 2010
DocketCivil Action No. 2010-1001
StatusPublished

This text of Allen v. US Supreme Court Office of the Clerk (Allen v. US Supreme Court Office of the Clerk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allen v. US Supreme Court Office of the Clerk, (D.D.C. 2010).

Opinion

FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUN 15 2010 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA : 8rk. u.s. District & Bankruptcy urts tor the District of Columbia

Gene Allen, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 10 1001 ) The United States Supreme Court Office ) of the Clerk, ) ) Respondent. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter comes before the court on the plaintiff's pro se petition for a writ of habeas

corpus and application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the application to

proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdi ction.

Plaintiff is an inmate in the Lovelock Correctional Center, in Lovdock, Nevada, serving a

sentence imposed by a Nevada state court. See Compl. at 1 & Ex. H. He filed this habeas

petition, captioned as one filed under 28 U.S.c. § 2244, but construed as one under § 2254, after

the Clerk of the United States Supreme Court refused to accept his petition for a writ of

certiorari without the docketing fee. Id at 3. He appears to allege that this refusal violates his

criminal rights, and he also appears to challenge the validity of his state conviction. Id at 5-7.

Federal court review of state convictions is available under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 but only

after the exhaustion of available state remedies. See 28 U.S.C. §2254(b)(1). Thereafter, "an

application for a writ of habeas corpus [] made by a person in custody under the judgment and

sentence of a State court ... may be filed in the district court for the district wherein such person is in custody or in the district court for the district within which the State court was held which

convicted and sentenced [petitioner] and each of such district courts shall have concurrent

jurisdiction to entertain the application." 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). To the extent that petitioner has

exhausted his state remedies, his federal recourse lies in the United States District Court for the

District of Nevada.

A separate final order accompanies this memorandum opinion.

1J...tr - istri(:t Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Allen v. US Supreme Court Office of the Clerk, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-us-supreme-court-office-of-the-clerk-dcd-2010.