Allen v. the Nevada Bd. of Parole Comm'rs

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

GENE ANTHONY ALLEN, No. 72019 Petitioner, vs. THE NEVADA BOARD OF PAROLE FILED

COMMISSIONERS, FEB 1 6 2017 Respondent.

Fn 4-thzF- tiramirk

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION This original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges respondent's April 2014 decision denying petitioner parole. Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170; NRS 34.320; NRS 34.330; Int? Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

1--\CA.4 atç , J. Hardesty

ta9 a on- Parraguirk

, J. AL:5361

Stiglich

, J.

cc: Gene Anthony Allen

Attorney General/Carson City

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A e I7-Oso