Home/Superior Court of North Carolina/Allen v. . Stokes

Allen v. . Stokes

2 N.C. 122
Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided October 5, 1794·Published

Opinion

This is an issue to be determined by the Court, and that the writ and declaration was proof of the amount of the plaintiff's demand, and as the sum demanded in the writ and declaration was above the sum of £ 50, they ordered a respondeas ouster. Quere de hoc.

See McNaughton v. Hunter, post, 454; Bell v. Bell, 5 N.C. 95; McGheev. Draughon, 4 N.C. 240.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen v. . Stokes, 2 N.C. 122 (N.C. Ct. App. 1794).

2 N.C. 122 (Allen v. . Stokes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McGehee v. . Draughon
4 N.C. 240 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1815)