Allen v. State

80 S.W.2d 968, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 633
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 27, 1935
DocketNo. 17456
StatusPublished

This text of 80 S.W.2d 968 (Allen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allen v. State, 80 S.W.2d 968, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 633 (Tex. 1935).

Opinion

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for one year. .

Omitting the formal parts, the indictment reads as follows: “In the county and state aforesaid Otis Allen did then and there unlawfully and for the purpose of sale possess liquor then and there capable of producing intoxication.” The indictment is fundamentally defective for the reasons stated in Offield v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 75 S.W.(2d) 882.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Offield v. State
75 S.W.2d 882 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 S.W.2d 968, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-state-texcrimapp-1935.