Allen v. State

4 Ohio Law. Abs. 330
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Allen v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 Ohio App. 85
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided February 23, 1926·No. No. 1632·Published

Opinion

RICHARDS, J.

Declan Allen was convicted in the Lucas Common Pleas of obtaining $400 by false pretenses. It was claimed that no offense was charged in the indictment and the trial judge erred in admission of evidence and in making charge to the jury.

The trial judge in the charge to the jury used the expression “If he made these false pretenses”. This it was claimed was error. On prosecution of error, the Court of Appeals held:

It was for the jury to find from the evidence under instructions of the court whether the pretenses were false or not, and the expression was an unfortunate one to use; but reading the whole charge together, it is perfectly clear that the trial judge left to the jury to find all the facts and to determine whether the representations were false or otherwise; and it is therefore apparent that the jury could not have been misled by this expression.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen v. State, 4 Ohio Law. Abs. 330 (Ohio Ct. App. 1926).

4 Ohio Law. Abs. 330 (Allen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.