Allen v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Allen v. State

117 S.E. 824, 30 Ga. App. 284, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 410

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 16, 1923

Docket14341

StatusPublished

This text of 117 S.E. 824 (Allen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allen v. State, 117 S.E. 824, 30 Ga. App. 284, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 410 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Beoyi.es, C. J.

While the preponderance of the evidence was in the defendant’s favor, it cannot be held that his conviction was unauthorized by any evidence; and, the finding of the jury having been approved by [285]*285the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere with it.

Decided May 16, 1923. T. P. Stephens, for plaintiff in error. William Brunson, solicitor, contra. ■

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beoyi.es, C. J.

While the preponderance of the evidence was in the defendant’s favor, it cannot be held that his conviction was unauthorized by any evidence; and, the finding of the jury having been approved by [285]*285the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere with it.

Decided May 16, 1923. T. P. Stephens, for plaintiff in error. William Brunson, solicitor, contra. ■

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 S.E. 824, 30 Ga. App. 284, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-state-gactapp-1923.