Allen v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Allen v. State

106 S.E. 796, 26 Ga. App. 671, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 588

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 14, 1921·No. 12085·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

Where a defendant is charged in two accusations with the offense of simple larceny, pleads guilty to both charges, and is sentenced to the chain-gang for each offense, he cannot in one bill of exceptions bring to this court for review the question of whether or not the trial judge erred in overruling his single motion to withdraw his two pleas of guilty. There being no provision of law for such procedure, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain such bill of exceptions. See Futch v. Mathis, 148 Ga. 558 (97 S. E. 516), and cases there cited.

Writ of error dismissed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

Where a defendant is charged in two accusations with the offense of simple larceny, pleads guilty to both charges, and is sentenced to the chain-gang for each offense, he cannot in one bill of exceptions bring to this court for review the question of whether or not the trial judge erred in overruling his single motion to withdraw his two pleas of guilty. There being no provision of law for such procedure, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain such bill of exceptions. See Futch v. Mathis, 148 Ga. 558 (97 S. E. 516), and cases there cited.

Writ of error dismissed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., eoneur.

Allen v. State, 106 S.E. 796, 26 Ga. App. 671, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 588 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

106 S.E. 796 (Allen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related