Allen v. State
This text of 106 S.E. 796 (Allen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where a defendant is charged in two accusations with the offense of simple larceny, pleads guilty to both charges, and is sentenced to the chain-gang for each offense, he cannot in one bill of exceptions bring to this court for review the question of whether or not the trial judge erred in overruling his single motion to withdraw his two pleas of guilty. There being no provision of law for such procedure, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain such bill of exceptions. See Futch v. Mathis, 148 Ga. 558 (97 S. E. 516), and cases there cited.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
106 S.E. 796, 26 Ga. App. 671, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-state-gactapp-1921.