Allen v. State

106 S.E. 796, 26 Ga. App. 671, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 588
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 14, 1921
Docket12085
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 106 S.E. 796 (Allen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allen v. State, 106 S.E. 796, 26 Ga. App. 671, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 588 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Luke, J.

Where a defendant is charged in two accusations with the offense of simple larceny, pleads guilty to both charges, and is sentenced to the chain-gang for each offense, he cannot in one bill of exceptions bring to this court for review the question of whether or not the trial judge erred in overruling his single motion to withdraw his two pleas of guilty. There being no provision of law for such procedure, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain such bill of exceptions. See Futch v. Mathis, 148 Ga. 558 (97 S. E. 516), and cases there cited.

Writ of error dismissed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dempsey v. State
119 S.E.2d 298 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 S.E. 796, 26 Ga. App. 671, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-state-gactapp-1921.