Allen v. State

103 S.E. 101, 25 Ga. App. 331, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 787
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 12, 1920·No. 11365·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

Tlie evidence, as disclosed by the record, was insufficient ■to authorize the defendant's conviction, and the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. W. B. Mebane, for plaintiff in error. J. F. Kelly, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen v. State, 103 S.E. 101, 25 Ga. App. 331, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 787 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

103 S.E. 101 (Allen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reese v. State
155 S.E. 373 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Harrell v. State
142 S.E. 746 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Lane v. State
134 S.E. 807 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)