Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Allen v. State

Allen v. State

103 S.E. 101, 25 Ga. App. 331, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 787
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 12, 1920
Docket11365
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 103 S.E. 101 (Allen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allen v. State, 103 S.E. 101, 25 Ga. App. 331, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 787 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

Tlie evidence, as disclosed by the record, was insufficient ■to authorize the defendant's conviction, and the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. W. B. Mebane, for plaintiff in error. J. F. Kelly, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reese v. State
155 S.E. 373 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Harrell v. State
142 S.E. 746 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Lane v. State
134 S.E. 807 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 S.E. 101, 25 Ga. App. 331, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-state-gactapp-1920.