Allen v. State

68 S.E. 558, 8 Ga. App. 90, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 41
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 19, 1910·No. 2592·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Russell, J.

Though the evidence is weak and unsatisfactory, it was sufficient to authorize the conviction of the defendant, and the verdict was approved by the trial judge. Proof of the corpus delicti may be sufficient to corroborate a confession, if the jury is satisfied with this degree of corroboration. ■ Judgment affirmed.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen v. State, 68 S.E. 558, 8 Ga. App. 90, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 41 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

68 S.E. 558 (Allen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lastinger v. State
67 S.E.2d 411 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
Mathis v. State
191 S.E. 272 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)
Bryant v. State
106 S.E. 797 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Perdue v. State
99 S.E. 797 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Thomas v. State
88 S.E. 917 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Sutton v. State
88 S.E. 122 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)