Allen v. State

938 So. 2d 653, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16908, 2006 WL 2872521
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Allen v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 873 So. 2d 576
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 11, 2006·No. No. 4D06-1035·Published

Opinion

MAY, J.

The defendants appeal their convictions and sentences for attempted robbery. In their second issue, they argue that the absence of a valid waiver of jury trial requires a reversal. The State agrees that the record fails to contain “either a written or oral waiver of a jury trial” by any of the defendants. We therefore reverse and remand the case for a new trial. Cf Tucker v. State, 559 So.2d 218 (Fla.1990) (opining that best practice is to have record evidence of both an oral and written waiver of jury trial, but affirming when there was record evidence of only a knowing and intelligent oral waiver).

Reversed and Remanded.

WARNER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen v. State, 938 So. 2d 653, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16908, 2006 WL 2872521 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

938 So. 2d 653 (Allen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tucker v. State
559 So. 2d 218 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)