Allen v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Allen v. State

211 So. 2d 590, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5471

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 25, 1968

DocketNo. 67-974

StatusPublished

This text of 211 So. 2d 590 (Allen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allen v. State, 211 So. 2d 590, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5471 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By this appeal, the appellant seeks reversal of his conviction for the crime of robbery, following a non-jury trial.

He argues that his conviction must be reversed because it was based upon circumstantial evidence which did not exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence.

The record contains sufficient, competent evidence to support the finding that the accused was the perpetrator of this crime and that his guilt was proven beyond any reasonable hypothesis of innocence. See Head v. State, Fla.1952, 62 So.2d 41; Asher v. State, 90 Fla. 75, 105 So. 140 (1925); Tirko v. State, Fla.App.1962, 138 So.2d 388.

The judgment and sentence be, and the same are, therefore,

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI