Allen v. State

157 So. 341, 117 Fla. 163, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1215
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedNovember 2, 1934
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 157 So. 341 (Allen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allen v. State, 157 So. 341, 117 Fla. 163, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1215 (Fla. 1934).

Opinion

Buford, J.

The plaintiff in error was tried and convicted in the Circuit Court of Pinellas' County, Florida, under an indictment charging him together with other persons therein named with the offense of breaking and entering the building of another with intent to commit grand larceny.

There is no evidence in the record to sustain a conviction of the offense charged as the evidence shows conclusively that the plaintiff in error here, defendant in the court below, was not either actually or constructively present at the place where and the time when the crime was committed. There is evidence in the record which tends to prove that this plaintiff in error planned the perpetration of the act and probably furnished part of the instrumentalities with which the crime was committed. If he did all the evidence indicated he did he would have been guilty as an accessory before the fact and not as' a principal.

The judgment must be reversed. It is so ordered.

Reversed.

*164 Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur. Davis, C. J., and Terrell, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Loy v. State
87 So. 2d 501 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
157 So. 341, 117 Fla. 163, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-state-fla-1934.