Allen v. State Ex Rel. Pride

Alabama Court of Appeals

Allen v. State Ex Rel. Pride

129 So. 304, 23 Ala. App. 543, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 148

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 10, 1930

Docket8 Div. 25.

StatusPublished

This text of 129 So. 304 (Allen v. State Ex Rel. Pride) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allen v. State Ex Rel. Pride, 129 So. 304, 23 Ala. App. 543, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 148 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appeal is by the respondent, in the court below, from an -order of the court in setting aside the verdict of the jury wherein the issues involved were determined in favor of the respondent; and this, in defiance of the court’s instructions to the jury that their verdict should be for the state; this with hypothesis.

The action was brought in the name of the state, upon relation of the solicitor of the T,wenty-Third judicial circuit, and was based upon the provisions of subdivision (1) of section 9932 of the Code 1923.

The cause was here submitted -on May 22, 1930, but without assignment of error, or brief of appellant. For this reason the appeal of necessity must be, and is, dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appeal is by the respondent, in the court below, from an -order of the court in setting aside the verdict of the jury wherein the issues involved were determined in favor of the respondent; and this, in defiance of the court’s instructions to the jury that their verdict should be for the state; this with hypothesis.

The action was brought in the name of the state, upon relation of the solicitor of the T,wenty-Third judicial circuit, and was based upon the provisions of subdivision (1) of section 9932 of the Code 1923.

The cause was here submitted -on May 22, 1930, but without assignment of error, or brief of appellant. For this reason the appeal of necessity must be, and is, dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 So. 304, 23 Ala. App. 543, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-state-ex-rel-pride-alactapp-1930.