Allen v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Allen v. State

88 So. 195, 17 Ala. App. 631, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 249

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Allen v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 18 Ala. App. 346 →

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided December 14, 1920·No. 6 Div. 723.·Published

Opinion

MERRITT, J.

The defendant was convicted under an indictment, charging that he did after the 25th day of January, 1919, distill, make, or manufacture alcoholic, spirituous, malted, or mixed liquors or beverages, a part of which was alcohol, and sentenced to the penitentiary for not less than 13 nor more than 15 months. There is no bill of exceptions in the record; the time for filing one having expired. The record discloses that the conviction was legal and regular, and, there being no error in the record, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MERRITT, J.

The defendant was convicted under an indictment, charging that he did after the 25th day of January, 1919, distill, make, or manufacture alcoholic, spirituous, malted, or mixed liquors or beverages, a part of which was alcohol, and sentenced to the penitentiary for not less than 13 nor more than 15 months. There is no bill of exceptions in the record; the time for filing one having expired. The record discloses that the conviction was legal and regular, and, there being no error in the record, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Allen v. State, 88 So. 195, 17 Ala. App. 631, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 249 (Ala. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

88 So. 195 (Allen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.