Allen v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Allen v. State

88 So. 195, 17 Ala. App. 631, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 249

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 14, 1920

Docket6 Div. 723.

StatusPublished

This text of 88 So. 195 (Allen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allen v. State, 88 So. 195, 17 Ala. App. 631, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 249 (Ala. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

MERRITT, J.

The defendant was convicted under an indictment, charging that he did after the 25th day of January, 1919, distill, make, or manufacture alcoholic, spirituous, malted, or mixed liquors or beverages, a part of which was alcohol, and sentenced to the penitentiary for not less than 13 nor more than 15 months. There is no bill of exceptions in the record; the time for filing one having expired. The record discloses that the conviction was legal and regular, and, there being no error in the record, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MERRITT, J.

The defendant was convicted under an indictment, charging that he did after the 25th day of January, 1919, distill, make, or manufacture alcoholic, spirituous, malted, or mixed liquors or beverages, a part of which was alcohol, and sentenced to the penitentiary for not less than 13 nor more than 15 months. There is no bill of exceptions in the record; the time for filing one having expired. The record discloses that the conviction was legal and regular, and, there being no error in the record, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 So. 195, 17 Ala. App. 631, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-state-alactapp-1920.