Allen v. State

141 Ala. 35
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedNovember 15, 1904
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 141 Ala. 35 (Allen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allen v. State, 141 Ala. 35 (Ala. 1904).

Opinion

DOWDELL, J.

The appellant was indicted at the fall term 1898, of the Circuit Court of Perry County, for the murder of one Peter Munder; was tried and convicted at the fall term 1899, of murder in the first degree, and the death penalty was fixed by the jury. There [36]*36was a judgment and sentence by tbe court iiursuant to the verdict, and November 3rd, 1899, was fixed as the day for the execution of the sentence, but the defendant having prayed an appeal to- the. Supreme Court, at his instance the court made an order suspending the execution of the sentence, pending an appeal and until the same, was passed upon by this court. On October 10th, 1899, the defendant escaped from custody and remained at large until September 13th,' 1903, at which time he was captured and remanded to- the custody of the sheriff of the county. At the fall term 1903, the solicitor moved the. circuit court to order the sheriff to produce the defendant in court and for the court to fix a day for the execution of the defendant under the former judgment of conviction, as provided by section 5439 of the Criminal Code. The defendant objected to the granting of said motion on the ground that an appeal had been taken to the Supreme Court from the judgment of conviction, and that the same was still pending and undisposed of, and that the circuit court was without jurisdiction and authority to pass a legal sentence upon him until the determination of such appeal. It was shown that at the time of the escape and flight of the defendant no certificate of appeal had been made by the clerk of the circuit court to- this court, and nothing was ever afterwards done in the prosecution of such appeal. The circuit court overruled the defendant’s objection to the motion and sentenced the defendant to' be executed on the 8th of January, 1904. From this sentence of the court the present appeal is taken.

Section 4313 of the Criminal Code, relating to appeals by defendants in criminal cases, reads as follows: “Any person convicted of a criminal offense in the circuit court, or other court from which an appeal lies directly to the Supreme Court, may appeal from the judgment of conviction to the Supreme Court.” It will be observed, that the statute authorizes an appeal only from the judgment of conviction. The present appeal is not taken from the judgment of conviction, but from the sentence of the circuit court made under section [37]*375439 of the Criminal Code, appointing a day for the execution of the defendant. And as no appeal lies from, sncli an order, this court is without jurisdiction to review the case, and it follows that the appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hart v. State
939 So. 2d 948 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2005)
Duck v. State
92 So. 2d 55 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1957)
Pounders v. State
74 So. 2d 640 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1954)
Duncan v. State
74 So. 2d 620 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1954)
Dawson v. State
66 So. 2d 567 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1952)
Wright v. State
67 So. 798 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1915)
Bryant v. State
70 So. 961 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1915)
Rivers v. State
69 So. 387 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1915)
Harper v. State
69 So. 302 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1915)
Arrington v. State
67 So. 620 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
141 Ala. 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-state-ala-1904.