Allen v. Southland Corp.

275 A.D.2d 333, 712 N.Y.S.2d 427, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8965

This text of 275 A.D.2d 333 (Allen v. Southland Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allen v. Southland Corp., 275 A.D.2d 333, 712 N.Y.S.2d 427, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8965 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated May 12, 1999, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The defendant failed to demonstrate its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851; Gill v Rose Enters., 272 AD2d 573). Thompson, J. P., Luciano, Feuerstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Winegrad v. New York University Medical Center
476 N.E.2d 642 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Gill v. J.S. Rose Enterprises, Inc.
272 A.D.2d 573 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
275 A.D.2d 333, 712 N.Y.S.2d 427, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8965, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-southland-corp-nyappdiv-2000.