Allen v. Southag Manufacturing.

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedJuly 16, 2003
DocketI.C. NO. 085596
StatusPublished

This text of Allen v. Southag Manufacturing. (Allen v. Southag Manufacturing.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allen v. Southag Manufacturing., (N.C. Super. Ct. 2003).

Opinion

***********
The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Stephenson. The appealing party has shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence; therefore, the Full Commission REVERSES the decision of the Deputy Commissioner and enters the following Opinion and Award.

***********
The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following which were entered into by the parties in a Pre-Trial Agreement and at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner as:

STIPULATIONS
1. Plaintiff's alleged date of injury is March 17, 1999.

2. On that date, the parties were subject to and bound by the provisions of the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act.

3. On that date, an employer/employee relationship existed between the parties.

4. National Benefits America, Inc. was the compensation carrier on the risk.

5. Judicial Notice may be taken of all Industrial Commission forms on file.

6. Plaintiff's average weekly wage is to be determined.

7. Stipulated Exhibit 2 consists of copies of Industrial Commission forms and orders.

8. Stipulated Exhibit 3 consists of copies of all medical records in the possession of the parties at the time of the hearing.

9. Stipulated Exhibit 4 is a transcribed recorded statement from the plaintiff.

10. Stipulated Exhibit 5 consists of copies of employment records.

11. Stipulated Exhibit 6 consists of defendants' Answers to Interrogatories.

12. Stipulated Exhibit 7 consists of plaintiff's Answers to Interrogatories.

13. The depositions of Dr. Robert C. Jacobson, Dr. Keith P. Kittelberger, Dr. David A. Konanc, Dr. Carroll Kratzer, Mr. David Wiley, and Dr. Robert John Wilson, III are a part of the evidentiary record in this case.

***********
Based upon the evidence of record, the Full Commission makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. At the time of the deputy commissioner hearing in this case, plaintiff was forty-three (43) years old. Plaintiff has a high school diploma, but no other licenses or special skills.

2. Defendant-employer is engaged in the manufacture of heavy metal trailers. In approximately February 1998, plaintiff began work with defendant-employer as a painter earning wages of $9.00 per hour. Plaintiff's hourly wage later increased to $10.00 per hour. Plaintiff regularly worked forty hours per week and received some overtime.

3. Prior to the accident that is the subject of this claim, plaintiff had no significant pre-existing foot conditions. Plaintiff previously suffered from Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (RSD) in his right hand in 1991 and 1992. However, this RSD resolved with treatment. No pre-existing conditions prevented plaintiff from earning full wages in his usual employment with defendant-employer prior to March 17, 1999.

4. On or about March 17, 1999, plaintiff was performing his assigned job duties when a large piece of steel angle iron fell on his left foot, crushing it. This incident was reported to Paul Witt, plaintiff's supervisor. Defendant-employer prepared an incident report.

5. Plaintiff received medical care for his injuries at MedFirst Urgent Care and his medical bills were "reimbursed" by the employer. Plaintiff was out of work immediately following this incident for approximately one week. Plaintiff never received a copy of a Form 19, Employer's Report of Injury to Employee, regarding the March 17, 1999 incident.

6. Plaintiff attempted to return to work in a light duty job performing duties that were modified from their normal requirements to specially accommodate plaintiff's injuries resulting from the accident on March 17, 1999; however, he suffered increasing foot and leg pain.

7. Plaintiff continued receiving medical treatment during his attempt to return to work. Among others, plaintiff was treated by Dr. Konanc at Raleigh Neurology who suspected Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (RSD), now called Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS). Dr. Konanc referred plaintiff to Carolina Pain Consultants where a nerve conduction study was performed. At the time of the deputy commissioner hearing of this case, Dr. Robert C. Jacobson at Carolina Pain Consultants was treating plaintiff with multiple medications and a dorsal column stimulator was under consideration. In addition, Dr. Robert Wilson at Triangle Orthopaedics Pain Clinic also examined plaintiff.

7. Plaintiff testified at length concerning his attempts to continue working. For approximately thirteen months, plaintiff worked while still experiencing severe pain at defendant-employer's facility. During a considerable portion of this time, plaintiff was taking narcotic pain medication, including methadone, in order to keep working. Dr. Jacobson had advised plaintiff to find less strenuous work.

8. In approximately March 2000, plaintiff was unable to continue working due to increased pain and because his treating doctors removed him from his job. Both defendant-employer and the insurance carrier were aware that plaintiff ceased working; however, workers' compensation benefits were never paid. Plaintiff's claim for benefits related to injuries received during the March 17, 1999 incident was never formally accepted or denied by the insurance carrier.

9. At the time of the deputy commissioner hearing of this matter, defendants were still paying plaintiff's medical bills; even so, plaintiff had not yet received any temporary total disability benefits. Since March 2000, plaintiff has not worked anywhere. Plaintiff sustained no injury to his leg or foot anywhere other than in his job with defendant-employer.

10. The Full Commission has carefully reviewed and considered the deposition testimony and medical record evidence of all health care providers in this case, including but not limited to that of, Drs. Kittelberger, Konanc, Jacobson, Kratzer, Wilson and Mr. David Wiley, certified professional counselor. Drs. Kittelberger, Konanc, Jacobson, Kratzer, and Wilson all testified that plaintiff's injuries and resulting Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) were caused by the injury in his employment on March 17, 1999. Mr. Wiley testified plaintiff's depression and other psychological injuries were associated with plaintiff's injury in his employment and resulting CRPS.

11. Dr. Jacobson is plaintiff's current treating physician. All of the other medical providers deferred to Dr. Jacobson's opinion regarding disability and plaintiff's current condition. Dr. Jacobson testified that plaintiff has reached maximum medical improvement and is totally disabled from earning any wages in competitive employment.

12. Plaintiff currently suffers from chronic and severe pain in his left foot and leg. Activity increases plaintiff's pain. Plaintiff takes a number of prescription medications, including methadone. Plaintiff's medications have severe side effects which impact his ability to maintain regular attendance and production in any competitive employment.

13. Based on a careful review of all evidence of record, the Full Commission finds by the greater weight of the evidence that plaintiff suffered a compensable injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment on March 17, 1999 resulting in plaintiff's injuries to his left foot and leg, including his CRPS. Plaintiff's compensable injury and resulting CRPS either caused or substantially aggravated, exacerbated, or accelerated plaintiff's psychological conditions and depression.

14.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kisiah v. W.R. Kisiah Plumbing, Inc.
476 S.E.2d 434 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1996)
Russell v. Lowes Product Distribution
425 S.E.2d 454 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1993)
Mills v. City of New Bern
468 S.E.2d 587 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1996)
Walston v. Burlington Industries
271 S.E.2d 516 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980)
Fish v. Steelcase, Inc.
449 S.E.2d 233 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1994)
Stevenson v. City of Durham
188 S.E.2d 281 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1972)
Saums v. Raleigh Community Hospital
487 S.E.2d 746 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1997)
Pruitt v. KNIGHT PUBLISHING COMPANY
218 S.E.2d 876 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1975)
Hollman v. City of Raleigh, Public Utilities Department
159 S.E.2d 874 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1968)
Doggett v. South Atlantic Warehouse Co.
194 S.E. 111 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1937)
Hildebrand v. . Furniture Co.
193 S.E. 294 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1937)
Hildebrand v. McDowell Furniture Co.
212 N.C. 100 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Allen v. Southag Manufacturing., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-southag-manufacturing-ncworkcompcom-2003.