Allen v. Smith
This text of 4 Ill. 97 (Allen v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court:
The only question presented for the Court in this case is, did the Court below err in overruling the motion for a new trial. From the bill of exceptions, it appears that the evidence was contradictory. In such cases, the jury have the right to weigh it, and decide as the balance may preponderate, and unless they decide manifestly against the weight of evidence, a verdict will not be disturbed.
We cannot say that they have thus decided, consequently the motion for a new trial was correctly refused. This being the only error assigned, and there being no probable cause shown, the motion to make the writ of error a supersedeas is disallowed with costs.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Ill. 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-smith-ill-1841.