Allen v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided March 26, 2021·No. 17-1141·Unpublished

Opinion

CORRECTED

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-1141V UNPUBLISHED

CRYSTAL ALLEN, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: February 4, 2021 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Damages Decision Based on Proffer; HUMAN SERVICES, Tetanus Diphtheria acellular Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine; Shoulder Respondent. Injury

John Robert Howie, Howie Law, PC, Dallas, TX, for petitioner.

Colleen Clemons Hartley, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On August 23, 2017, Crystal Allen filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) after receiving a Tdap vaccination on April 7, 2016. Petition at 1. Petitioner further alleges that she received the vaccination in the United States, she experienced symptoms within 48 hours of vaccination, and she suffered the residual effects or complications of her illness for more than six months. Petition at 1, 12. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On May 15, 2018, after Respondent conceded that Petitioner’s injury was caused- in-fact by the Tdap vaccine she received on April 7, 2016, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for her right shoulder injury. On February 1, 2021, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”)

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). indicating Petitioner should be awarded all items of compensation set forth in the life care plan and illustrated by the chart attached at Tab A. Proffer at 1-2. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Proffer at 1-2. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner the following compensation:

1. A lump sum payment of $690,041.51, representing compensation for life care expenses expected to be incurred during the first year after judgment ($18,842.07), lost earnings ($492,214.00), pain and suffering ($170,000.00), and past unreimbursable expenses ($8,985.44), in the form of a check payable to Petitioner, Crystal Allen.

2. An amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract, subject to the conditions described in the Proffer, that will provide payments for the life care items contained in the life care plan, as illustrated by the chart at Tab A, beginning with compensation for Year Two (on the first anniversary of the date of the judgment) and all subsequent years, paid to the life insurance company from which the annuity will be purchased.

This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 15(a).

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

CRYSTAL ALLEN,

Petitioner, No. 17-1141V ECF Chief Special Master Corcoran v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

On August 23, 2017, Crystal Allen (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under

the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act”

or “Act”), alleging that she suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration

(“SIRVA”) to her right shoulder from a Tetanus Diphtheria acellular Pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccine

administered on April 7, 2016. 1 Petition at 1. On May 15, 2018, the Secretary of Health and

Human Services (“respondent”) filed his Rule 4(c) Report conceding that petitioner is entitled to

compensation for a right shoulder injury based on causation-in-fact. ECF No. 27. On May 15,

2018, the Court issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation. ECF

No. 28.

I. Items of Compensation

A. Life Care Items

The parties engaged life care planner Linda Curtis, RN MS, CNLCP, CCM, to provide an

estimation of petitioner’s future vaccine-injury related needs. For the purposes of this proffer,

1 On March 28, 2018, petitioner filed a First Amended Petition. ECF No. 21. the term “vaccine related” is as described in the respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report. All items of

compensation identified in the life care plan are supported by the evidence, and are illustrated by

the chart entitled Appendix A: Items of Compensation for Crystal Allen, attached hereto as Tab

A. 2 Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded all items of compensation set forth in

the life care plan and illustrated by the chart attached at Tab A. Petitioner agrees.

B. Lost Earnings

The parties agree that based upon the evidence of record, petitioner has suffered a loss of

earnings. Therefore, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded lost earnings as

provided under the Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(A). Respondent proffers that the

appropriate award for petitioner’s lost earnings is $492,214.00. Petitioner agrees.

C. Pain and Suffering

Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $170,000.00 in actual and

projected pain and suffering. This amount reflects that any award for projected pain and

suffering has been reduced to net present value. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner

agrees.

D. Past Unreimbursable Expenses

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2021).

Allen v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Allen v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-1
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(A)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a