Allen v. Scott

358 So. 2d 1112, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15972
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 28, 1978·No. No. HH-5·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

SMITH, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellants Allen successfully resisted ap-pellee Scott’s claim for a mechanic’s lien, but the trial court denied the Allens’ post-trial motion for attorney’s fees. That was error. Section 713.29, Florida Statutes (1977) requires an award of reasonable fees to the prevailing party for the services of his or her attorney. Charter Development Corp. v. Eversole, 342 So.2d 143 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). Appellants’ other point on appeal is without merit.

REVERSED and REMANDED to award appellants a reasonable fee for their attor[1113] ney’s representation on the mechanic’s lien claim in the trial court. No consideration need be given to appellate services, for which no fee request was presented to this court.

ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen v. Scott, 358 So. 2d 1112, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15972 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

358 So. 2d 1112 (Allen v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

O'Kon and Co., Inc. v. Riedel
588 So. 2d 1025 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Cloutier v. Central Contracting, Inc.
418 So. 2d 1233 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)