Allen v. R & H Oil & Gas Co.

70 F.3d 26, 1995 WL 680425
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Allen v. R & H Oil & Gas Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 70 F.3d 26
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 16, 1995·No. 94-60444·Published

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before JOLLY, SMITH and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The petition for rehearing is DENIED, and no member of the panel or judge in regular active service having requested that the court be polled on rehearing en banc (see Fed.R.App.P. 35 and 5th Cir.R. 35), the suggestion for rehearing en banc is DENIED. Although the panel members have some disagreement regarding the interpretation of Mississippi law, the panel is of the unanimous view that the opinion in this case specifically reflects a result under the Mississippi law of punitive damages and is not to be construed as a comment on any similar ease that might arise under the law of any other state.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen v. R & H Oil & Gas Co., 70 F.3d 26, 1995 WL 680425 (5th Cir. 1995).

70 F.3d 26 (Allen v. R & H Oil & Gas Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related