Allen v. . Plummer

63 N.C. 307
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 5, 1869·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Reade, J.

At the time the sheriff made the sale, he had im his hands two executions, of different dates; and it is settled,, that the older execution must be first satisfied.

The fact that the older was an alias, issued subsequently to* the junior, makes no difference, as the alias relates back to the1’ date of the original, and is, in that sense, the older. The fact that the older was issued from another county (Warren,) to’ the sheriff of Halifax, makes no difference, as the process off the Courts have when issued, the same force all over the State-

The execution of Lanier and Bro., did not reach the sheriff" until after the sale, and is out of the question. The funds, or so much as may be necessary, will be applied to the older execution — Mrs. Plummer’s — and if there is any surplus', it will be applied to the junior execution — Allen’s.

Per Curiam. There is no error-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen v. . Plummer, 63 N.C. 307 (N.C. 1869).

63 N.C. 307 (Allen v. . Plummer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ross v. . Alexander
65 N.C. 576 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1871)