Allen v. Perri
This text of Allen v. Perri (Allen v. Perri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1018
BETTY PORTER ALLEN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
JAMES ANTHONY PERRI, M.D.; PIEDMONT EMERGENCY MEDICINE ASSOCIATES, PA, a dissolved North Carolina Corporation; CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG HOSPITAL AUTHORITY, d/b/a Carolinas HealthCare System; CAROLINAS MEDICAL CENTER-UNIVERSITY, a facility of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:10-cv-00666-GCM)
Submitted: March 14, 2011 Decided: March 31, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Betty Porter Allen, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Betty Porter Allen appeals the district court’s order
granting leave to proceed without prepayment of fees and
dismissing this action alleging medical malpractice and
negligence for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Allen v. Perri, No. 3:10-cv-00666-GCM (W.D.N.C. Jan. 4, 2011).
We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Allen v. Perri, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-perri-ca4-2011.