Allen v. . Peden

4 N.C. 442
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJuly 5, 1816
StatusPublished

This text of 4 N.C. 442 (Allen v. . Peden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allen v. . Peden, 4 N.C. 442 (N.C. 1816).

Opinion

The administrator in this case was in law the owner of the persons emancipated by the General Assembly. The act of emancipation passed not only without his consent, but against it. However laudable the motives which led to the act of emancipation, it is too plainly in violation of the fundamental law of the land to be sanctioned by judicial authority.

We are compelled to announce it a nullity, and to give judgment for the plaintiff.

Cited: Robinson v. Barfield, 6 N.C. 423; Allen v. Allen, 44 N.C. 62;Bryan v. Wadsworth, 18 N.C. 389; Hoke v. Henderson, 15 N.C. 16, 17;Wilson v. Jordan, 124 N.C. 715; R. R. v. Cherokee, 177 N.C. 97. *Page 334

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Den Ex Dem. Wood v. Sparks
18 N.C. 389 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1835)
Hoke v. . Henderson
15 N.C. 1 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1833)
Walser v. Jordan
124 N.C. 683 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 N.C. 442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-peden-nc-1816.