Allen v. Patuxent Institution

Fourth Circuit

Allen v. Patuxent Institution

47 F. App'x 660

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 8, 2002·No. No. 02-6374·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Robert Ray Allen appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motions for summary judgment and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Allen v. Patuxent Inst., No. CA-00-3502-PJM (D.Md. Feb. 6, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Robert Ray Allen appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motions for summary judgment and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Allen v. Patuxent Inst., No. CA-00-3502-PJM (D.Md. Feb. 6, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Allen v. Patuxent Institution, 47 F. App'x 660 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

47 F. App'x 660 (Allen v. Patuxent Institution) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related