Allen v. OneMain Financial Group, LLC

E.D. California

Allen v. OneMain Financial Group, LLC

District Court, E.D. California·Decided March 27, 2020·No. 1:19-cv-01720·Unknown

Opinion

L. Paul Mankin (SBN 264038) Joseph Rocco (SBN 326862) The Law Office of L. Paul Mankin 4655 Cass Street, Suite 410 San Diego, CA 92109 pmankin@paulmankin.com jrocco@paulmankin.com Tel: 800-219-3577 Fax: 323-207-3885 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DENISE ALLEN, ) Case No. 1:19-CV-01720-LJO-JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ) JOINT STIPULATION AND; vs. ) ORDER CLOSING THE ACTION ONE MAIN FINANCIAL, and DOES 1 ) through 10, inclusive, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) The parties to this action, acting through counsel, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) hereby stipulate, in consideration of a negotiated settlement executed by them, to the Dismissal With Prejudice of this action, including all claims stated herein against all parties, with each party to bear its own attorney's fees and costs. Dated: March 26th, 2020 By: /s/L. Paul Mankin L. Paul Mankin The Law Office of L. Paul Mankin Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: March 26th, 2020 By: /s/Jordan Yu Jordan Yu Yu | Mohandesi LLP Attorney for Defendant

Filed electronically on this 26th day of March 2020, with:

United States District Court CM/ECF system Notification sent electronically via the Court’s ECF system to:

Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston United States District Court Eastern District of California Jordan S. Yu, Esq, Yu | Mohandesi LLP 633 W. 5th St., Ste. 2800 Los Angles, CA 90071

This 26th Day of March 2020 /s/L. Paul Mankin L. Paul Mankin // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // The parties have settled their case and have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice and with each side to bear their own fees and costs. (Doc. 9) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to assign a district judge for the purpose of closing this case and then to close this action.

Dated: March 26, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

L. Paul Mankin (SBN 264038) Joseph Rocco (SBN 326862) The Law Office of L. Paul Mankin 4655 Cass Street, Suite 410 San Diego, CA 92109 pmankin@paulmankin.com jrocco@paulmankin.com Tel: 800-219-3577 Fax: 323-207-3885 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DENISE ALLEN, ) Case No. 1:19-CV-01720-LJO-JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ) JOINT STIPULATION AND; vs. ) ORDER CLOSING THE ACTION ONE MAIN FINANCIAL, and DOES 1 ) through 10, inclusive, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) The parties to this action, acting through counsel, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) hereby stipulate, in consideration of a negotiated settlement executed by them, to the Dismissal With Prejudice of this action, including all claims stated herein against all parties, with each party to bear its own attorney's fees and costs. Dated: March 26th, 2020 By: /s/L. Paul Mankin L. Paul Mankin The Law Office of L. Paul Mankin Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: March 26th, 2020 By: /s/Jordan Yu Jordan Yu Yu | Mohandesi LLP Attorney for Defendant

Filed electronically on this 26th day of March 2020, with:

United States District Court CM/ECF system Notification sent electronically via the Court’s ECF system to:

Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston United States District Court Eastern District of California Jordan S. Yu, Esq, Yu | Mohandesi LLP 633 W. 5th St., Ste. 2800 Los Angles, CA 90071

This 26th Day of March 2020 /s/L. Paul Mankin L. Paul Mankin // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // The parties have settled their case and have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice and with each side to bear their own fees and costs. (Doc. 9) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to assign a district judge for the purpose of closing this case and then to close this action.

Dated: March 26, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Allen v. OneMain Financial Group, LLC, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

Pincite

Allen v. OneMain Financial Group, LLC (Allen v. OneMain Financial Group, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related