Allen v. Miklos

Superior Court of Maine·Decided July 22, 2008·No. CUMcv-08-273·Unpublished

Opinion

STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT CUMBERLAND, ss. CIVIL ACTION Docket No. CV-08-27p

• , .'" I ;: . _,- "/'~ ..

JOHN T. ALLEN,

Plaintiff,

DONALD L. GARBRECKT

v. ORDER L.J\W LIBRARY

LORENE MIKLOS, et aI., RE'CE\VED AUl1 1 ? v""o)

Defendant.

Defendant H & N Corporation has moved to dismiss Counts II, IV, and V of the complaint.

Plaintiff John Allen' opposition papers does not respond to H & N's arguments with respect to Counts IV and V, and those counts are therefore dismissed as against H &N.

With respect to Count II, however, H & N's motion is denied. In Kezer v. Mark Stimson Associates, 1999 ME 184 <JI<JI 12, 15, 742 A.2d 898, 902-03, the Law Court stated that the Legislature has defined the duty that real estate brokers owe to buyers. That duty includes a duty not to "knowingly give false information." 32 M.R.S. § 13273(2)(A). Count II of Allen's complaint alleges that H & N knowingly provided false information about the neighbors, Complaint <JI<JI 19-20, and is therefore sufficient to state a cognizable claim for knowing misrepresentation.

The court agrees with H & N that 32 M.R.S. § 13273(2)(A) appears to preclude a claim for negligent misrepresentation, but does not construe Count II as asserting such a claim. The court acknowledges that if Count II alleges knowing misrepresentation and Count III alleges fraud, there remains a question whether there is any difference

between Counts II and III - other than that Count II is specifically directed against H & N and Count III is against both defendants. That question is deferred for another day.

The entry shall be:

Defendant H & N Corporation's motion to dismiss is granted as to Counts IV and V of the complaint and denied as to Count II. The clerk is directed to incorporate this order in the docket by reference pursuant to Rule 79(a). DATED: July 2."2- , 2008

~~

Thomas D. Warren

Justice, Superior Court

erland County ). Box 287 V1aine 04112-0287

DAVID BPA~DT ESQ

PO BOX 837 df -

WINDHAM I'iE 04062 DG? VI d B(a(' I 9-;

{ t---o ((' II tJ ~/l L/(/)

U. Box 287 ,­ Maine 04112-0287

~('ntlrrl *ubifJ!~

(8 If tlJ Wr(l)

BERNARD KUBETZ ESQ

PO BOX 1210

BANGOR ME 04402

J. ~ox ~O( \IIaine 04112-0287

NEAL WEINSTEIN ESQ

PO BOX 660

OLD ORCHARD BEACH ME 04064

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen v. Miklos, (Me. Super. Ct. 2008).

Allen v. Miklos (Allen v. Miklos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kezer v. Mark Stimson Associates
1999 ME 184 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1999)