Allen v. Miklos

Superior Court of Maine·Decided July 22, 2008·No. CUMcv-08-273·Unpublished

Opinion

STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT CUMBERLAND, ss. CIVIL ACTION Docket No. CV-08-27p • , .'" I ;: . _,- "/'~ ..

JOHN T. ALLEN,

Plaintiff, DONALD L. GARBRECKT v. ORDER L.J\W LIBRARY

LORENE MIKLOS, et aI., RE'CE\VED AUl1 1 ? v""o)

Defendant.

Defendant H & N Corporation has moved to dismiss Counts II, IV, and V of the

complaint.

Plaintiff John Allen' opposition papers does not respond to H & N's arguments

with respect to Counts IV and V, and those counts are therefore dismissed as against H

&N.

With respect to Count II, however, H & N's motion is denied. In Kezer v. Mark

Stimson Associates, 1999 ME 184

that the Legislature has defined the duty that real estate brokers owe to buyers. That

duty includes a duty not to "knowingly give false information." 32 M.R.S. §

13273(2)(A). Count II of Allen's complaint alleges that H & N knowingly provided false

information about the neighbors, Complaint

a cognizable claim for knowing misrepresentation.

The court agrees with H & N that 32 M.R.S. § 13273(2)(A) appears to preclude a

claim for negligent misrepresentation, but does not construe Count II as asserting such

a claim. The court acknowledges that if Count II alleges knowing misrepresentation

and Count III alleges fraud, there remains a question whether there is any difference between Counts II and III - other than that Count II is specifically directed against H &

N and Count III is against both defendants. That question is deferred for another day.

The entry shall be:

Defendant H & N Corporation's motion to dismiss is granted as to Counts IV

and V of the complaint and denied as to Count II. The clerk is directed to incorporate

this order in the docket by reference pursuant to Rule 79(a).

DATED: July 2."2- , 2008

~~ Thomas D. Warren Justice, Superior Court

2 erland County ). Box 287 V1aine 04112-0287

DAVID BPA~DT ESQ PO BOX 837 df - WINDHAM I'iE 04062 DG? VI d B(a(' I 9-;

{ t---o ((' II tJ ~/l L/(/)

U. Box 287 ,­ Maine 04112-0287

~('ntlrrl *ubifJ!~ (8 If tlJ Wr(l) BERNARD KUBETZ ESQ PO BOX 1210 BANGOR ME 04402

J. ~ox ~O( \IIaine 04112-0287

NEAL WEINSTEIN ESQ PO BOX 660 OLD ORCHARD BEACH ME 04064

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen v. Miklos, (Me. Super. Ct. 2008).

Allen v. Miklos (Allen v. Miklos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kezer v. Mark Stimson Associates
1999 ME 184 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1999)