Allen v. Miklos
This text of Allen v. Miklos (Allen v. Miklos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT CUMBERLAND, ss. CIVIL ACTION Docket No. CV-08-27p • , .'" I ;: . _,- "/'~ ..
JOHN T. ALLEN,
Plaintiff, DONALD L. GARBRECKT v. ORDER L.J\W LIBRARY
LORENE MIKLOS, et aI., RE'CE\VED AUl1 1 ? v""o)
Defendant.
Defendant H & N Corporation has moved to dismiss Counts II, IV, and V of the
complaint.
Plaintiff John Allen' opposition papers does not respond to H & N's arguments
with respect to Counts IV and V, and those counts are therefore dismissed as against H
&N.
With respect to Count II, however, H & N's motion is denied. In Kezer v. Mark
Stimson Associates, 1999 ME 184 that the Legislature has defined the duty that real estate brokers owe to buyers. That duty includes a duty not to "knowingly give false information." 32 M.R.S. § 13273(2)(A). Count II of Allen's complaint alleges that H & N knowingly provided false information about the neighbors, Complaint a cognizable claim for knowing misrepresentation. The court agrees with H & N that 32 M.R.S. § 13273(2)(A) appears to preclude a claim for negligent misrepresentation, but does not construe Count II as asserting such a claim. The court acknowledges that if Count II alleges knowing misrepresentation and Count III alleges fraud, there remains a question whether there is any difference between Counts II and III - other than that Count II is specifically directed against H & N and Count III is against both defendants. That question is deferred for another day. The entry shall be: Defendant H & N Corporation's motion to dismiss is granted as to Counts IV and V of the complaint and denied as to Count II. The clerk is directed to incorporate this order in the docket by reference pursuant to Rule 79(a). DATED: July 2."2- , 2008 ~~ Thomas D. Warren Justice, Superior Court 2 erland County ). Box 287 V1aine 04112-0287 DAVID BPA~DT ESQ PO BOX 837 df - WINDHAM I'iE 04062 DG? VI d B(a(' I 9-; { t---o ((' II tJ ~/l L/(/) ~('ntlrrl *ubifJ!~ (8 If tlJ Wr(l) BERNARD KUBETZ ESQ PO BOX 1210 BANGOR ME 04402 NEAL WEINSTEIN ESQ PO BOX 660 OLD ORCHARD BEACH ME 04064U. Box 287 , Maine 04112-0287
J. ~ox ~O( \IIaine 04112-0287
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Allen v. Miklos, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-miklos-mesuperct-2008.