Allen v. Metz

1 A.D.3d 299, 766 N.Y.S.2d 860
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 3, 2003
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 A.D.3d 299 (Allen v. Metz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allen v. Metz, 1 A.D.3d 299, 766 N.Y.S.2d 860 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, for an accounting and to set aside an assignment of assets under Business Corporation Law § 720 (a), the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Segal, J.), dated June 21, 2002, as granted the motion of the defendant Alicia Metz for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her and denied his motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant Alicia Metz. Metz, a former corporate officer of the defunct defendant Bechtoldt Corporation (hereinafter Bechtoldt), established through her testimony that the assignment of leases made by Bechtoldt to Metz and another person was for a legitimate business purpose, and was fair and reasonable to Bechtoldt (see Norlin Corp. v Rooney, Pace Inc., 744 F2d 255, 265 [1984]). The assignment was made by Bechtoldt, as the managing agent for certain cooperative apartment corporations, for the purpose of enabling Metz to [300]*300commence summary proceedings, inter alia, for the nonpayment of rent by delinquent tenants of the respective cooperatives. Thus, Metz made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact that the assignment was unlawful (see Business Corporation Law § 720 [a] [2]).

The plaintiffs remaining contentions either are academic or without merit. Santucci, J.E, S. Miller, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Husamudeen v. DeBlasio
2020 NY Slip Op 1165 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 A.D.3d 299, 766 N.Y.S.2d 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-metz-nyappdiv-2003.