Allen v. McKinney Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Allen v. McKinney Manufacturing Co.

246 A.D. 572

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 246 A.D. 572 (Allen v. McKinney Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allen v. McKinney Manufacturing Co., 246 A.D. 572 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There was presented a question of fact as to whether plaintiff had not fully performed so as to entitle him to compensation under his contract with the defendant.

It follows, therefore, that the judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s ease unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

There was presented a question of fact as to whether plaintiff had not fully performed so as to entitle him to compensation under his contract with the defendant.

It follows, therefore, that the judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s ease unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 A.D. 572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-mckinney-manufacturing-co-nyappdiv-1935.