Allen v. Kendrick
This text of 114 S.E. 718 (Allen v. Kendrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where a tenant holding over arrested dispossessory warrant proceedings brought by a landlord, by filing, as required by section 5387 of the Civil Code (1910), a counter-affidavit and a bond conditioned that the tenant should pay to the landlord “ such sum, with costs, as may be recovered against her on the trial of the case,” and on a trial of issue a verdict and judgment for the landlord were rendered for a specified sum as double rent to the date of the trial, and directing the issue of a writ of possession against the tenant, and on the sheriff’s execution of the writ the tenant paid the full amount of the judgment and was ousted from the premises, a subsequent suit by the landlord against the tenant' and her surety on the original condemnation-money bond for double rent during the period from the date of the original judgment to the date of eviction under the writ of possession, will not lie, since the express conditions of the original bond were fulfilled by the rendition of the original judgment and its payment. Corbin v. McCrary, 23 Ga. App. 780, 781 (99 S. E. 472).
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
114 S.E. 718, 29 Ga. App. 241, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-kendrick-gactapp-1922.