Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Allen v. Kendrick

Allen v. Kendrick

97 S.E. 552, 23 Ga. App. 112, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 71
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 23, 1918
Docket9836
StatusPublished

This text of 97 S.E. 552 (Allen v. Kendrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allen v. Kendrick, 97 S.E. 552, 23 Ga. App. 112, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 71 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

It does not appear from tlie record that in refusing to grant a continuance of the ease the trial court abused its wide discretion. This being the only question argued in the brief.of counsel for the plaintiff in error, the judgment of the court below is

Affirmed.

Bloodworth, J., concurs. Stephens, J., not presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 S.E. 552, 23 Ga. App. 112, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-kendrick-gactapp-1918.