Allen v. Kemp

Ninth Circuit

Allen v. Kemp

62 F.2d 1047, 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 3922

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 27, 1933·No. Nos. 7047, 7046·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Applications for leave to appeal denied. An appeal lies from the order of the court allowing or disallowing creditors’ claims. We see no reason for reviewing an: interlocutory order of the court permitting a creditor to contest the claims of other creditors. See, on this general subject, In re Gelino’s Inc. (C. C. A.) 51 F.(2d) 875. The question as to whether or not a creditor who has opposed the allowance of the claims of other creditors can appeal from the order allowing the claim is not involved upon this application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Applications for leave to appeal denied. An appeal lies from the order of the court allowing or disallowing creditors’ claims. We see no reason for reviewing an: interlocutory order of the court permitting a creditor to contest the claims of other creditors. See, on this general subject, In re Gelino’s Inc. (C. C. A.) 51 F.(2d) 875. The question as to whether or not a creditor who has opposed the allowance of the claims of other creditors can appeal from the order allowing the claim is not involved upon this application.

Allen v. Kemp, 62 F.2d 1047, 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 3922 (9th Cir. 1933).

Pincite

62 F.2d 1047 (Allen v. Kemp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related