Allen v. Kemp

Ninth Circuit

Allen v. Kemp

62 F.2d 1047, 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 3922

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 27, 1933

DocketNos. 7047, 7046

StatusPublished

This text of 62 F.2d 1047 (Allen v. Kemp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allen v. Kemp, 62 F.2d 1047, 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 3922 (9th Cir. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Applications for leave to appeal denied. An appeal lies from the order of the court allowing or disallowing creditors’ claims. We see no reason for reviewing an: interlocutory order of the court permitting a creditor to contest the claims of other creditors. See, on this general subject, In re Gelino’s Inc. (C. C. A.) 51 F.(2d) 875. The question as to whether or not a creditor who has opposed the allowance of the claims of other creditors can appeal from the order allowing the claim is not involved upon this application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Applications for leave to appeal denied. An appeal lies from the order of the court allowing or disallowing creditors’ claims. We see no reason for reviewing an: interlocutory order of the court permitting a creditor to contest the claims of other creditors. See, on this general subject, In re Gelino’s Inc. (C. C. A.) 51 F.(2d) 875. The question as to whether or not a creditor who has opposed the allowance of the claims of other creditors can appeal from the order allowing the claim is not involved upon this application.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 F.2d 1047, 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 3922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-kemp-ca9-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack