Allen v. Kansas Town & Land Co.

56 P. 1131, 83 Kan. 814, 1911 Kan. LEXIS 270
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided March 11, 1899·No. No. 11,105·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss the proceedings because of the insufficiency of the appeal bond can not be sustained, but an examination of the record satisfies us that the court of appeals reached a correct conclusion, and for the reasons given by that court (6 Kan. App. 252) its judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen v. Kansas Town & Land Co., 56 P. 1131, 83 Kan. 814, 1911 Kan. LEXIS 270 (kan 1899).

56 P. 1131 (Allen v. Kansas Town & Land Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Grischott
237 P.2d 712 (California Court of Appeal, 1951)
Cave v. Rinehart
123 P. 766 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1912)
Gibson v. McClees
119 P. 870 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1912)