Allen v. Harris

40 Ga. 220
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 15, 1869
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 40 Ga. 220 (Allen v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allen v. Harris, 40 Ga. 220 (Ga. 1869).

Opinion

Warner, J.

Under the present existing laws of this State, and especially under the provisions of the 1662d and 1664th sections of the.Code, a colored woman may swear a bastard child to its putative father in the same manner as a' free white woman may do; and the same proceedings should be had in the one ease as in the other, under the law in such cases made and provided. The Judge did not err in refusing to discharge the defendant from his arrest, under the proceedings had against him, under the bastardy law.

Let the judgment of the Court below be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. DuBose
3 S.E. 309 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1887)
Mulling v. State
74 Ga. 10 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 Ga. 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-harris-ga-1869.