Allen v. . Godfrey

44 N.Y. 433, 1871 N.Y. LEXIS 60
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 1, 1871
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 44 N.Y. 433 (Allen v. . Godfrey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allen v. . Godfrey, 44 N.Y. 433, 1871 N.Y. LEXIS 60 (N.Y. 1871).

Opinions

No opinion is brought to us showing the grounds upon which the Supreme Court reversed the judgments of the courts below. The evidence upon which the verdict was rendered was fairly conflicting, insomuch that it could not have been reversed as being against evidence. The chief ground upon which the respondent's counsel seeks to uphold the judgment appealed from is, in substance, that the judgment was in fact rendered on Sunday, though not entered until Monday, when it was formally docketed for an amount exceeding the amount for which it was rendered on the previous day. Concede that it was rendered on Sunday; all that was done on that day, after receiving the verdict, was absolutely void. The justice had no more right to tax the costs or render judgment on Sunday, than he had to issue execution on that day. The statute in terms declares that "Nocourt shall be open or transact any business on Sunday, unless itbe for the purpose of receiving a verdict or discharging ajury." (3 R.S., 3d ed., 467, § 16.) It was the duty of the justice, when he received the verdict, to stop until Monday morning, and then tax the costs and enter judgment. Whatever else he may have done on Sunday could not prejudice either party. It was his duty to disregard it, and make up and enter his judgment on Monday. No inaccuracy is alleged in the making up of the judgment entered on Monday. The County Court was, therefore, right in affirming it. The judgment appealed from must, therefore, be reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Kramer
133 Misc. 2d 239 (New York Supreme Court, 1986)
People v. Warner
244 A.D. 833 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)
Devault v. Sampson
221 P. 284 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1923)
State Bank v. Spence
76 N.Y.S. 984 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1902)
People v. Dewey
23 Misc. 267 (New York Supreme Court, 1898)
People ex rel. Lower v. Donovan
29 Abb. N. Cas. 172 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)
Hodge v. State
29 Fla. 500 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1892)
City of Parsons v. Lindsay
41 Kan. 336 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1889)
Wearne v. Smith
32 Wis. 412 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1873)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 N.Y. 433, 1871 N.Y. LEXIS 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-godfrey-ny-1871.